WeUseCoupons.com - View Single Post - Bigger isn’t Always Better. Buying Smaller.
View Single Post
  post #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2008, 10:12 AM
BestCouponer's Avatar
BestCouponer BestCouponer is offline
BestCouponer is Happy
Administrator
Trader Feedback: (10), 100%
 
About
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fort Thomas, KY
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 535
Thanked 5,142 Times in 1,247 Posts
My Mood:
LOLs: 14
LOLed at 201 Times in 56 Posts
BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!BestCouponer User is a Coupon Queen!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bargainsniffer View Post
Even without coupons, one needs to evaluate per item prices on different sizes. Every great once in a while, getting two of the smaller items IS cheaper than one larger. One just has to spend time in the store comparing prices and stopping cart traffic. (Something many are unwilling to do.)
It happens more often then you might think. I was conditioned to believe that the bigger item was always more efficient for the manufacturer so it was always a better buy.

This is not always so, and in fact the smaller item is cheaper more than I had ever thought.
Reply With Quote Send a private message to %1$s
The Following User Says Thank You to BestCouponer For This Useful Post:
princessmaybelle (04-13-2009)